Knowledge Economy Studies

Evaluating Open-Source Digital Library Systems: A Comparative Study

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Yaghoub Norouzi 1
Nayere Jafarifar 2

1 Professor in Knowledge and Information Science, Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences, University of Qom, Iran.

2 MSc in Knowledge and Information Science, Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.22034/kes.2024.2045664.1027
Abstract
Digital Libraries (DLs) enable the development, organization, and administration of digital resources and collections while offering search, retrieval, and other information services through computer networks and electronic platforms. The efficient management of digital content in these libraries bolsters the knowledge economy and fosters an environment conducive to scientific advancements and innovations. Open source is increasingly viewed as a viable alternative to commercial digital library systems, largely due to dissatisfaction with their functionality. Additionally, budget constraints faced by libraries and the rising costs of software development and maintenance have further fueled this shift. Open-source digital library software offers free access alongside reliable functionality, making it an appealing option. Selecting high-quality software is a critical decision in designing a digital library, as it forms the foundation for delivering services. However, the wide range of available options can make the selection process challenging. The key issue lies in clearly defining the library's information requirements and its intended usage. To simplify the decision-making process, we evaluated six widely adopted open-source digital library systems including CDSware, DSpace, Fedora, Greenstone, Keystone, and EPrints. The assessment was based on a checklist comprising eight categories of key criteria. Among these, DSpace emerged as the top performer, followed by Fedora, Greenstone, CDSware, and EPrints. Conversely, Keystone was ranked as the lowest one due to inadequate support for several essential features outlined in the checklist. This study aims to assist decision-makers in selecting and implementing open-source digital library systems effectively in their institutions.

Keywords

Content Management
Digital Library
Knowledge Economy
Open Source

Subjects

Ahammad, N., Bahry, F. D. S., & Hussaini, H. (2024). Influence of open-source software on Bangladesh academic library service sustainability: a conceptual framework. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, (ahead-of-print).
Ahammad, N., Saiful Bahri, F. D., & Husaini, H. (2024). Exploring the open-source impact on Bangladesh academic library service sustainability. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society.
Ajani, Y. A., Adefila, E. K., Olarongbe, S. A., Enakrire, R. T., & Rabiu, N. (2024). Big data and the management of libraries in the era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution: implications for policymakers. Digital Library Perspectives, 40(2), 311-329. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLP-10-2023-0083.
Anyim, W. O. (2018). E-Library resources and services: Improvement and innovation of access and retrieval for effective research activities in university e-libraries in Kogi State Nigeria. Library Philosophy and Practice, 0_1-21.
Begum, D., Rashid, M. M., & Mahamud, R. (2012, October). Greenstone digital library software: A case study of Bangladesh. In Proceedings of International Seminar on Digital Libraries for Digital Nation (pp. 125-138).
Das, A. K. (2008). Open access to knowledge and information: scholarly literature and digital library initiatives-the South Asian scenario. UNESCO, New Delhi.
David, I., Latifaj, M., Pietron, J., Zhang, W., Ciccozzi, F., Malavolta, I., & Hebig, R. (2023). Blended modeling in commercial and open-source model-driven software engineering tools: A systematic study. Software and Systems Modeling, 22(1), 415-447.
Dawood, K. A., Sharif, K. Y., Ghani, A. A., Zulzalil, H., Zaidan, A. A., & Zaidan, B. B. (2021). Towards a unified criteria model for usability evaluation in the context of open source software based on a fuzzy Delphi method. Information and Software Technology, 130, 106453.
Dent, V. F. (2007). Local economic development in Uganda and the connection to rural community libraries and literacy. New library world, 108(5/6), 203-217. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074800710748777.
Du Plessis, T., & Mabunda, T. T. (2016). Change management in an academic library in the knowledge economy. South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science, 82(1), 53-61.
Formanek, M. (2021). Solving SEO Issues in DSpace-based Digital Repositories: A Case Study and Assessment of Worldwide Repositories. Information Technology and Libraries, 40(1). https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v40i1.12529.
Garzarelli, G., Limam, Y. R., & Thomassen, B. (2008). Open source software and economic growth: A classical division of labor perspective. Information Technology for Development, 14(2), 116-135. https://doi.org/10.1002/itdj.20092.
Hussein, D. I. R. M. (2017). Open source digital repository software in Egyptian university libraries and its role in supporting economic development: Reality and Aspiration. Cybrarians Journal, (47), NA-NA.
Jabeen, M. (2024). The adoption footprints of Koha as a library management system in university libraries of Pakistan. Journal of Information Science, 01655515231214980.
Kahn, A., & Wu, X. (2020). Impact of digital economy on intellectual property law. J. Pol. & L., 13, 117.
Kallinikou, D., Papadopoulos, J. M., Kaponi, A., & Strakantouna, V. (2009). Intellectual property issues for DLs in the Internet networked public sphere. In 8th International Conference Computer Ethics: Philosophical Enquiry (Vol. 344).
Kamdar, N. H. (2019). Open Source Software for Libraries. LIBRARIANSHIP DEVELOPMENT THROUGH INTERNET OF THINGS AND CUSTOMER SERVICE, 49.
Kampa, R. K., & Kaushik, P. (2019). Economics of open source library software: evidences from Indian libraries. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 68(4/5), 337-355. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-04-2018-0036.
Kampa, R. K., & Kaushik, P. (2019). Economics of open source library software: evidences from Indian libraries. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 68(4/5), 337-355.
Khan, M. K., & Sheikh, A. (2022). Open source software adoption for development of institutional repositories in university libraries of Islamabad. Information Discovery and Delivery, 51(1), 47-55.
Khan, M. K., & Sheikh, A. (2022). Open source software adoption for development of institutional repositories in university libraries of Islamabad. Information Discovery and Delivery, 51(1), 47-55.
Khatami, A., & Zaidman, A. (2024). State‐of‐the‐practice in quality assurance in Java‐based open source software development. Software: Practice and Experience.
Kissa, B., Georganta, Z., Gounopoulos, E., & Kitsios, F. (2024). Exploring the Cost Effectiveness of Services in Academic Libraries: A Case Study with the Use of Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing. College & Research Libraries, 85(2), 187.
Mandal, S. (2018). Designing and developing digital content management system through open source software and standards. Parameters, 4(1), 1-14.
Moahi, K. H. (2012, September). Promoting African indigenous knowledge in the knowledge economy: Exploring the role of higher education and libraries. In Aslib proceedings (Vol. 64, No. 5, pp. 540-554). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012531211263157.
Moradia, S., Singh, S., & Aravind, S. (2024). The Role of Technology in Facilitating Open Access and Knowledge Sharing in Libraries. Library Progress International, 44(3), 4418-4423.
Panda, S., & Kaur, N. (2023). Blockchain: A New Technology in Library System and Management. In Handbook of Research on Advancements of Contactless Technology and Service Innovation in Library and Information Science (pp. 211-230). IGI Global.
Patra, C. (2006). Developing a digital library on ceramics. The Electronic Library, 24(4), 453-469. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640470610689160.
Paul, N. (2024). The Future of Information Science: Exploring the Role of Libraries in Data Management and Digital Curation. Library Progress International, 44(3), 4703-4710.
Rahman, M. H., & Islam, M. S. (2020). Building a Model for Digital Content Management in Agricultural University Libraries in Bangladesh. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 12(3), 359-379.
Srivastava, S., Bejalwar, S. A., Ramachandran, R., & Mishra, B. R. (2024). E-Commerce and DLs: Exploring the Future of Information Access in the Digital Economy. Library Progress International, 44(3), 11348-11358.
Stamou, A. (2017). Knowledge management in doctoral education toward knowledge economy. International Journal of Educational Management, 31(3), 320-331. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-11-2014-0143.
Tella, A., Amuda, H. O., & Ajani, Y. A. (2022). Relevance of blockchain technology and the management of libraries and archives in the 4IR. Digital Library Perspectives, 38(4), 460-475.
Verma, L., & Kumar, N. (2018). Comparative analysis of open source digital library softwares: A case study. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 38(5), 361.
Vijayakumar, P., Ramki, R., Priya, M. G., Rohith, M., Mohideen, A. S., & Rajalakshmi, M. (2024). The Role of DLs in Supporting Ecommerce Growth in the Digital Economy. Library Progress International, 44(3), 15622-15632.
Viji, C., Jagannathan, J., Rajkumar, N., Mohanraj, A., Nachiappan, B., & Kovilpillai, J. A. J. (2025). Leveraging Blockchain Technology to Enhance Library Security. In Enhancing Security and Regulations in Libraries with Blockchain Technology (pp. 181-200). IGI Global.
Wu, C. H., & Fang, W. C. (2011). Combining the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and the fuzzy Delphi method for developing critical competences of electronic commerce professional managers. Quality & Quantity, 45, 751-768.
Zharinov, S. (2020). The role of the library in the digital economy. Information Technology and Libraries, 39(4), 12-21. https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v39i4.12457.
Knowledge Economy Studies
Volume 1, Issue 1
April 2024
Pages 217-233

Home

Submit Manuscript

Contact Us